This is a post I made in the
Unofficial Charisma Arts Forum:
I spent a bit of time in a Chan (chinese zen) monestary in Taiwan, living the monastic life, but not taking the monastic vows. I did take the three refuges and 4 of the 5 precepts at the end of my stay.
The three refuges are, refuge in the Buddha: the way i understand this is to convey the idea that "hey the Buddha was a really intelligent guy, lets in no manner of speaking worship him, but perhaps he had some great ideas which we can learn from". secondly, refuge in the dharma, or looking to the scriptures and teachings of the buddha for insight. thirdly refuge in the sangha, just meaning to look to your fellow practitioners for help and guidance.
The five precepts, as they explained to me, should be taken by lay people (those followers not monastics) only when they feel they have already been incorporating those ideas into their lives, the precepts as the explained are a way to reinforce those ideas. Firstly, no killing, i will not even kill a spider, it's easy enough just to take it outside, this corresponds to the oneness of life and having compassion for all beings. Secondly, no stealing, i've never been much of a klepto so that wasn't too tough, just meaning that when one steals one creates suffering for another, so thusly it should be avoided. Thirdly, no lying, a little tougher, but again made due to the fact that when one lies, one creates suffering. Fourthly, no sexual misconduct, this means no rape or sex with married women (for us lay people at least). Fifthly, no intoxicants, now, when i took the precepts I was being honest in myself in that i was not ready to take this, so i did not, eventually yes I will, but not yet, this precept was created in order to help prevent followers from losing their mindfulness. It is also important to note that the precepts are in no way commandments as one may look at them, one will not be punished by any divine being, it is simply guidelines and suggestions on how one may live a happier life.
Now people mentioned that Buddhism focuses on the suffering and is thusly a very dark and dreary spiritual path. I highly disagree to this statement, not as a personal defense but in scholarly disagreement. Firstly, just from experience, I have never been happier in my current lifetime, nor seen happier people, than when i was in the monestary, nothing but smiling faces. From a scholarly view we see that it is easy to misunderstand the four noble truths (all life is suffering, the cause of suffering is desire, there is a way out of suffering, this way is the eight fold path, which nanda discussed in detail) as being completely focused on negative aspects of life, and I myself at one point disliked buddhism due to this fact. However, through experience and study, i have found that this is simply the setup that one must come to understand and accept in order to no longer focus on these aspects. At a base, perhaps unconcious level, I think we all understand the validity of the noble truths, we are all constantly looking for ways in which to improve something in our lives that seems to lack, we often do so through desiring and obtained more and more unneccessary material goods. Buddhism is simply pointing at this fact directly and up front, allowing one focus on the positive aspects of life once one realizes the negative and allows one to more successfully seek a life of true happiness. Now this is no easy task by any means, one generally speaking not attainable even in your current lifetime, which brings up another point, reincarnation.
Such a lofty goal of giving up all material desires and living life in pure happiness and contentment is most likely impossible in your current life, and Buddhism states that we have all lived countless (i believe in the lotus sutra they state a number that equates to the each grain of sand in the ganges having a world system in which there is a ganges river and couting the grains of sand in every single world system, alot in other words) number of lives in every conceivable form. This being said, when one is reborn a human, it is a great accomplishment, not an easy task, so there be proud of yoursleves everyone . This also means that we're not expected to be perfect, we are all have different levels of attainment (thus every religion, path, and view is to be respected) and a lovely quote from the Buddha, "Your work is to discover your world, and then, with all your heart, give yourself to it," in other words, find what makes you truly happy, and what most people find, is that what truly makes them happy, makes other's happy as well, love yourself, love others, and most importantly. Have fun.
How then, does this all relate to pickup, you ask? Good question. But in a very Buddhist way, everything relates to everything right? haha, got you there . But seriously, any method, that requires one to rigidly conform to a set form, is a negative method, thusly in my mind MM is negative and JM is positive. There are things to learn from MM but the way in which it requires conformity and sneaky methods is not healthy in my mind. JM on the other hand, allows one to bind the method to ones own mindset, it encourages positive usage and social mastery, after all who can one make happier than ones friends? So my advice then would be, find what you like about each and every form and take bits and pieces of everything, mold it into something that YOU enjoy and benefit from, do not mold yourself to it.
Peace my friends.